Child Friendly School Policies

Child Friendly School PoliciesThe purpose of this examine is to explore what Child Friendly School policies could learn from proportional and planetary interrogation. Reference to CFSs in Kenya lead be made with dialect on the background of CFSs, current practices and emergent critics, conquest stories, problems and pitfalls and what CIR female genitalia do to mortify some of these challenges. I will start by examining the rationale for exploring CFSs, base on literature and my professional experience. Following this background will be literature surrounding the concepts of CIR and CFSs in relation to international agendas, exploring how CFSs came into existence and the whimsical forces asshole it. I hence go on to instruction on a case study of CFS in Kenya, discussing the office of CIR in the Kenyas CFS, sway that CIR is utilise as a political tool in creating teaching manneral policy, alternatively than a query method or an intellectual inquiry. I will furt her critically analyze challenges facing CFSs and how friendship on CIR bed contri nonwithstandinge more than effectively to successful slaying of CFS policies. A conclusion establish on the literature and authors experience will then be functionn. Throughout the essay, I build a case in favour of CIR arguing that CIR stimulates critical reflections about our program lineal systems by investigating commonalities and discrepancys crosswise field of study b baseball clubs.Background and RationaleComparative and foreign instruction is iodine of the main fields of culture with galore(postnominal) benefits, judged by the bulk of studies reported in the literature. Central to this is that more countries around the world fork out boundulated some of their disciplineal policies based on acquaintance and inquiry from CIR. With the current wave of globalization, enquiryers and proficients, especially in the field of culture, ar incessantly trying to find ways of stream lining their commandmental policies with the global trends. According to Giddens (199064), globalization is the intensification of worldwide loving relations which link distance localities in such a way that local happenings ar shaped by events occurring many miles away and vice versa. Global forces on that pointfore have an doctor on shaping local practices at grass rootle trains. In order to do this tactically and critically, comparative and internal research remains teddy edge in informing people about the realities, the challenges and the practical effects of unscholarly transfer of ideas.One of the mention usings in education has been the prioritisation of sancti id education as opposed to adult education or high education. In Africa, this would be probably beca wont, as Oketch (2004) points out, rudimentary education yields high rates of returns comp bed to higher education. This has subsequently influenced government and non-governmental organizations to focus more on improving the timber of basic education. Child-friendly schools (CFSs) in Kenya is an prototype of a world-class sponsored by UNICEF with the educate of non just providing pip-squeakren rectify to education but the right to the right education. In an separate(prenominal) words, CFSs are more pertain with the feel of basic education in addition to its access. The emergence of CFSs in Kenya was catapulted by the forces of agendas 1 and 2 of Millenium Development Goals (MDGs) which emphasizes on the provision of basic education. One of the six reading For All (EFA) tendencys agreed by the population command Forum (2002) concerns education smell. The term quality in education is dynamic because of the social, political and sparing mount at which it is use. Milligan (2011276) adds that quality has, thus, been primed(p) as an integral cog in the educational tuition instrument although how educational quality is defined is a matter of great contention. B ecause of differences in contexts, it is imperative that k in a flashledge of comparative and world-wideistic research be used in designing policies and pedagogy in CFSs that fit that particular context.Furthermore, with the panic that some countries whitethorn lag behind as others move forward, countries from sub-Sahara Africa are now engaging in various practices in order to secure these educational goals, a race against the 2015 set deadline for attainment of EFA goals. As the clock ticks towards the year 2015, priority goals in education may change for post-2015 and the beat is further elevated. One of the efforts the government of Kenya is doing to improve the quality of education is by compound CFS model into the basic education system. Two major questions purloin here First, how is CFS realistic considering myriad challenges facing the FPE policy in Kenya? Secondly, if integrating CFS model into basic education will help in improving the quality of education, what les sons can CFS policies learn from CIR? It is against this background that the purpose of this essay hinges. publications ReviewIn this section, I will look at the concepts of Comparative and world(prenominal) Research (CIR) and Child Friendly School (CFS) based on the literature and merge them with the global forces that influenced the emergence of CFS with an attempt to unveil the voices behind the macrocosm of CFS in Kenya. In addition, I will use an warning of optical prism experience in Kenya to reinforce the witnessing of the role of foreign bodies in promoting quality through nearly strategized and executed projects, arguing that lessons from PRISM experience can be used as insights to successful carrying out of CFS policies.Concepts of Comparative and International Research (CIR) and Child Friendly School (CFS)CIR is a fusion of two broad areas of research Comparative Research and International Research. To infer its full meaning, it is important we define the two area s of research separately. In his definition of comparative research, Mills et al (2006621) argue thatComparative research is a broad term that includes twain quantitative and qualitative alikeness of social entities. Social entities may be based on many lines, such as geographical or political cardinals in the form of cross-national or regional comparisons.A similar perception was echoed by Noah and Eckstein (1969127), who viewed comparative education as an intersection of the social sciences, education and cross-national study which attempts to use cross-national data to test propositions about the relationships among education and society and amidst teaching practices and encyclopaedism outcomes.In light of this definition, comparative research in the context of education can be defined as a study of two or more entities or events (Crossley Watson, 2003) with the underlying goal of searching for similarity and variance. Cross-national or regional comparisons may include a nalyze educational policies, pedagogy, educational leadership and so on. According to Mills et al (2006 621), the search for variance places more emphasis on context and difference in order to understand specificities.International education, on the other hand, can be defined as the application of descriptions, analyses and insights in condition(p) in one or more nations to the problems of ontogenesis educational systems and institutions in other countries (Wilson 2000a 116). Therefore, world-wide research is concerned with research carried out crosswise two or more countries, lots with the purpose of comparing responses amongst them. This might be done in order to devise strategies that work wellspring across both or all these cultures or to suggest local adjustments to a global strategyThere is a close relationship between comparative and international education. Epstein (1994 918) points out, that international educators use findings derived from comparative education to und erstand infract the processes they examine, and thus, to enhance their ability to make policy. We can therefore draw from the above two definitions that CIR in education as a method of comparing both qualitative and quantitative entities in education across different countries, societies or cultures with the aim of chance uponing similarities and differences. It is however important to note that not all international research is comparative, and not all comparative research is international or cross-national.According to UNICEF (2007), a pip-squeak-friendly school is both a pip-squeak pursuance school and a child-centred school It is child seeking because it actively distinguishing excluded children to get them enrolled in school. It is a child-centred school because it acts in the silk hat interests of the child leading to the realization of the childs full potential, is concerned about the hale child her wellness, nutritional status, and well-organism and concerned about what happens to children before they lay school and after(prenominal) they leave school. A CFS system recognizes and respects childrens right and responsibilities it turn ins the enabling environment to realize childrens right not only in schools, but also in childrens central office and their communities. These include children from conflict zones, passageway children and children with disabilities. According to UNICEF Global instruction Strategy (2007) the Child-Friendly Schools model (see fig 1) is based on simple, rights-based concepts as described in Table 1.Concept of CFS commentaryRights Based SchoolCFS proactively seeks free children and encourages them to enrol, irrespective of gender, race, ability, social status, etc. gender Sensitive SchoolCFS promotes equality and equity in enrolment and transaction among girls and boys.Safe and Protective SchoolCFS ensures that all children can learn in a safe and inclusive environment.Community Engaged SchoolCFS encourages c onfederacy among schools, communities, parents and children in all aspects of the education process.Academically Effective SchoolCFS provides children with germane(predicate) knowledge and skills for surviving and thriving in life.Health Promoting SchoolCFS promotes the tangible and emotional health of children by meeting key nutritional and health care call for within schools.Table 1 Description of a CFSFig 1 Model of the Child-Friendly SchoolSource UNICEF, Global Education Strategy (20071)The CFS model provides a framework for planning (and monitoring the specialty of) strategies for increasing access to quality basic education with the specific focus on the development of strategies to include those children hitherto excluded from education (UNICEF, Global Education Strategy, 2007). It is important to note that CFS model is not a one-size-fits-all model. The model may differ from rustic to country depending on the context.International and Local Pressures and their influence s to makeup of CFS in KenyaEducation in sub-Sahara Africa, and indeed in Kenya, is crafted from both influences by global trends in education and the legacies of colonialism. Chisholm and Leyenderker (2008) ob sue thatSince 1990, the goals and purpose of education in sub-Sahara Africa has been reshaped by four interconnected developments globalisation, the changed focus of international aid agencies towards development assistance, the adaptation of sub-Sahara African countries to the clean world order with its new political emphases, and the spilling over of new pedagogical ideas from the USA and Europe into sub-Sahara Africa. (p 198)Kenya is a signer to a number of conventions in education, including the Convention to the Rights of the Child (1989), the World solvent on Education for All (Jomtien, 1990), the Dakar accord and the Millenium Development Goals (2000). In achievement of education development goals, Kenya is bound to, among other things, quality education by MDGs. T he Jomtien call for access for access, equity, quality and democracy in education appeared to promise both social and economic development (Chisholm and Leyenderker, 2008). Social and economic development, and continues to be call upd, requires educational change and educational change is necessary for social and economic development (ibid). Educational change, in turn, is perceived to depend on, amongst other things, the input from relevant development assistance projects. These projects, in the arena of education, are typically formulated with reference to internationally negotiated development agendas (like the MDGs) and priority (Crossley Watson, 2003). An example of these projects in Kenya is CFSs which are support by United Nations Childrens Fund (UNICEF). The Education Section of UNICEFs Programme Division introduced the Child Friendly Schools (CFS) framework for schools that serve the whole child in 1999 (Chabbott, 2004).Rationale for introducing CFS framework in KenyaThe amplification reliance of foreign aid to support education reform in Kenya has been accompanied by a transition, from understanding education as a human right and the general good to viewing it primarily in terms of its role to national growth and well-being through the development of the knowledge and skills societies are deemed to need (Arnove Torres 2007359). Occasional voices continue insisting that education is liberating, that training is inherently developmental (ibid 359).With the global concern that Sub-sahara Africa countries may not achieve Universal Primary Education (UPE) by 2015 unless the progress is deepen (Carceles et al., 2001 Bennel, 2002), Kenya responded by introducing Free Primary Education (FPE) policy in 2003 with both local and global pressure. The rationale behind introducing FPE was (apart from the pressure from global and international agendas) to alleviate poverty attributed to lack of literacy skills. The success story behind carrying into action of FPE policy is increased enrolment at chief(a) school level by approximately 50% from 5.9 million in 2003 to 9.38 million pupils accord to the Kenya Economic Survey 2011. However, there are myriad challenges facing the writ of execution of FPE policy which include high teacher-pupil ratio, piteous infrastructure, overcrowded classroom, inadequate textbooks and many schools lacking sanitation facilities. All of these challenges militate against the provision of quality teaching. There is no magic wand for fixing this problem of quality in education. In response to this CFS were introduced in Kenya. According to UNICEF Child-friendly Schools Manual (20061)The challenge in education is not simply to get children into school, but also to improve the general quality of schooling and address threats to participation. If both quality and access are tackled, children who are enrolled in main(a) school are likely to continue, concluded the full cycle, and achieve expected learning outcomes and successfully transition to lower-ranking coil school.The CFS framework (see appendix 3) aims at promoting child-seeking, child-centred, gender-sensitive, inclusive, community-involved, protective and healthy approaches to schooling and out-of-school education with a general goal of improving the quality of learning.Since CFSs are concerned with the quality of learning, it is important we look at the meaning of quality. The national examinations to obtain the Kenya Certificate of Primary Education (KCPE) at the end of primary cycle and the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) at the end of supplementary cycle are designed to evaluate the extent to which the primary and secondary graduates master the curriculum content. In other words, the national test hemorrhoid are used as the indicators of quality. The limitation of this indicator is that it does not intromit into account the context at which learning takes place i.e. the learning environment, learners unique characteristics etc. There are many definitions of quality but one of the descriptions of quality which emphasizes on the context was by Tikly (201110) who argued thatA good quality education is one that enables all learners to realise the capabilities they require to exit economically productive, develop sustainable livelihoods, contribute to peaceful and participatory societies and enhance wellbeing. The learning outcomes that are required vary according to context but at the end of the basic education cycle must include door levels of literacy and numeracy and life skills including awareness and prevention of disease.In his description, Tikly believes that a good quality education arises from interactions between three overlapping environments, namely the policy, the school and the home/community environments. In his perception of quality education, Tikly puts context into consideration i.e. needs of the learner, cultural and political contexts. In addition, he emphas izes on the relevance of what is taught and learned and how it fits the nature of particular learners in question. This encourages policy makers to take cognisance of ever-changing national development needs, the kinds of schools that different learners attend and the forms of educational disadvantage approach by different groups of learners when considering policy options(ibid11).The fact that CFS emphasizes on learner-centered pedagogy and puts the child at the centre or focal point in the learning process raises the idea of what is regarded as valuable knowledge and how this knowledge is acquired in this particular context. This leads us to the inquiry on the school of thought or paradigm behind introducing a contextualized CFS framework. CFS as an approach to education is premised on constructivism, a theory of knowledge arguing that humans generate knowledge and meaning from interaction between ideas and real experiences. According to constructivists, the notions of reality an d honor are socially constructed and in different context with the understanding that knowledge is subjective and embedded in multiple realities. Thus, quality of learning should be viewed in the context in which it is occurs.Towards Quality Basic Education In Kenya Developing Research Capacity and EvaluationBefore we acknowledge the contribution of CFS in providing quality education to the children at Primary school level, it will be prudent to review some of other contributions that has been made by international organizations in collaborations with the local government in promoting quality of education at grassroot levels in building research capacity.Kenya has had a history of benefiting from international assistance in its education sector. One of the programmes is the Primary Schools Management (PRISM), an foremost of DfID through the Ministry of Education, which places a lot of emphasis on participatory approaches and emphasis on mobilising community support, resource manag ement and utilisation, supporting learning of pupils and developing action plans. It targeted teacher training and management and the impact of this is overall potentiality of an education system which has a direct bearing on quality of education. According to Otieno Colclough (200926), PRISM is regarded as one of donor-funded programmes which had most positive impact on quality of basic education and CFS can learn from it. As Crossley et al (2005) note, the main objective of PRISM was to improve the quality of primary education through the training and support of head teachers in pragmatical management skills. Borrowing from the PRISM experience it is worthy learning that well planned and organized CFSs policies involving community participation at grass root level could help amplify local voices and lead to successful implementation of educational policies not only in Kenya but also other parts of African contexts.Challenges in implementing CFS in KenyaIn this section I will ex plore common challenges associated with the CFSs with an aim of illuminating and critiquing the gap between policy and practice in CFSs.Access and Quality Dilemma Which one should be beginning(a) priority?As I mentioned earlier, one of the role of CFS in Kenya is to improve the quality of learning. But the access to education is put away a challenge in Kenya and there is fear that Kenya will not have achieved EFA goals 1 and 2 by the year 2015. Many comparative researchers argue that different countries have different educational problems and it is the countrys obligation to identify what should be the priority and why. Aksoy (2008 218) observes that spot developed countries are mainly in use(p) in activities to increase the quality of education, or they practice and seek new techniques and methods of learning and teaching, developing countries struggle to provide equal opportunities for education, trying to increase the rate of participation of all citizens in basic education, w hich is actually compulsory. To take aim with its educational problems, each country works out countrywide or local solutions, depending on the nature of the problem.The tone of such statement is more closely allied to the question of priority. Priority in one country may not be a priority in other. In Kenya, the major problem basic education is facing is of access bandage higher education is facing the problem of quality. CFS focus more on quality, but in the Kenyan context, access to education is still a problem in basic education even after the introduction of FPE. The CFS concept of quality can however suit very well in some mild state commonwealth countries which have around universal access to basic education. It has been noted that small sates have now shifted education priorities towards focus in school effectiveness, quality and inclusion (Crossley, 2002) after ensuring that all children have accessed basic education and CFSs in Kenya should learn from small states tha t the priority should now be on access to basic education before shifting to quality.Atomizing the child is child-centred the solution to quality CFS?A key feature of a right-based, CFS system is that it is linked tightly to the child-centred learning process. CFS advocates for child-centred learning where a child is treated as a single entity or an atom in learning processes. The idea of atomizing a child has its drawbacks derived from child-centred learning. First, there is an oversight on early year development behaviour of the child. Psychologists believe children undergo various levels of development and their learning behaviours are different at each level. For instant, Vygotskys (1978) concept of the zone of proximal development (ZPD) implies that a child cannot ordinary create ZPD by himself he needs the more expert individual to bridge the gap between his current development level and his proximal level of development. Secondly, a child-friendly, democratic learning environ ment may not work successful in overcrowded classrooms and school with limited resources like it is the case in Kenya. Thirdly, child-centred learning weakens the role of the teacher. The idea that a child must be active in construction of knowledge is often understood to imply a diminishing role for the teacher in learning process who now becomes a coach or a facilitator. A call for paradigm renovation, from an exclusively child-centred learning to a faction of both child-centred learning and teacher-centred learning approach is important so that the flunk of one method is complemented by the other method.What Lessons can Kenya learn from other Countries in Implementing CFS? A Review on the Contribution of Comparative ResearchKing (2007) emphasizes the need to explore the tension between the national and the international policy agendas in Kenya in order to make informed decisions when crafting educational policies. Clearly, this is a view that acknowledges the contribution of CI R researchers in bridging theories, policies and practices with both local and global minds (Crossley, 2000) in trying to identify betters grounds to critically reflect and ensure appropriate course of action.Apparently, the term that is commonly used in Kenya and indeed many Africa countries in the initial processes of designing an educational policy is benchmarking. Essentially, this is unremarkably a comparative study which is carried out locally and/or internationally in trying to compare different models of policy framework with the aim of critical adaption or adoption. Lessons are well learnt when a comparisons are made, and this underscores the intensity level and significance of comparative research. Moreover, since problems transcend national borders, it is prudent to seek possible solutions by learning from a similar experience in another country, and this explains why international research is important. Kenya can learn from other countries that are either progressing or failing to implement CFS policies because lessons can either identify opportunities or gaps, based on comparative analysis. In these respect therefore, I have identified two key elements of CIR which could help implementation of CFS.The first element is on identification of the gap between policy and practice. Documenting the emerging good practices and lessons learned within the regions is useful in informing consequence based programming and advocacy to enable us to achieve better results. For example, a Global Evaluation Report published by UNICEF in 2009 on comparative studies of how to six countries (Guyana, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Philippines, South Africa, Thailand) with different experiences implementing CFS, demonstrated the pursuitCFSs in varying contexts successfully apply the three key principles of CFS models-inclusiveness, child-centredness and democratic participation.Schools operating in very different national contexts, with different levels of resources and dower populations with different needs have succeeded in being child-centred, promoting democratic participation, and being inclusive.Schools that had high levels of family and community participation and use of child-centred pedagogical approaches had stronger conditions for learning, that is, students felt safer, supported and engaged, and believed that the adults in the school supported the inclusion and success of each student. (UNESCO, 2009)Kenya can use this success report to assist in providing a broader scene on the ways in which CFSs can contribute to quality in the countrys unique context. The caution should however be that any steps interpreted should have hindsight of the current context in the country to avoid uncritical transfer of practice which may end up opening a Pandoras box.Secondly, through CIR, studies of educational systems from countries that share similar problems or pitfalls can provide information for learning possible consequences. A recent comparative evalu ation research conducted by UNESCO in Nigeria, Gunaya, Thailand and the Philippines on CFS pedagogy gave different findings. While teachers in Nigeria and Guyana mainly focused on meeting basic instructional material needs (textbooks, paper), many teachers in Thailand and the Philippines focused on having great access to information and communication technology (UNESCO 2009). Kenya experiences the comparable challenge as Nigeria and Gunaya, and data from these countries can be used to learn how they coping with inadequate basic instructional material. The caution here should be, that common problems may hold out in different countries, but common model cannot be utilize because every country has different culture/context (Crossley Watson, 2003 39). This provides invaluable information of what to adopt, modify or avoid.ConclusionIt is worthy reiterating Crossley(2003) emphasis that context matters and different countries have different needs and priorities even if they are faced with the same challenges. The value of CIR is studying foreign systems of education in order to become better fitted to study and understand our own (Sadler 1900, reprinted 1964310) and CIR can be used as a lense to focus on adaptable or adoptable practices. UNICEF repeatedly emphasises that CFS is a pathway to educational quality rather than a blueprint and that it is counterproductive to regard the CFS model as rigid, with a present number of defining characteristics or key components (2009c, Ch. 1, p. 9). Thus, the essay seek to present an overview in favour of the contribution of CIR by highlighting what CFS policiesin the Kenyan context could learn from CIR. As such, the essay acknowledges the role of CIR in stimulating critical thinking and reflections about CFSs system by evaluating its success and failures, strengths and weaknesses. This critical reflection facilitates self evaluation in our own context and the basis for determining appropriate courses of action. The essay also hints that CIR helps us understand global agendas and how they shape educational development projects from organizations and development agencies.